Any company who supplies the major
supermarkets is left in doubt as to the considerable power and ruthlessness of
these organisations. The revelations that Tesco employed a variety of
strategies to reduce their purchasing costs are not recent phenomena. Be it
payments for prominent display of products, changes to bar codes or
retrospective rebates there is no shortage of bullying tactics which are
brought to bear.
When Premier Foods tried to renegotiate
prices in light of rising commodity prices Tesco responded by delisting
products such as Hovis, Mr Kipling and OXO which saw Premier Foods lose £10
million over a 3 month period.
Against the current economic backdrop
supermarkets facing increasing competition from the discount retailers are
constantly looking for ways to boost their bottom line.
Particularly over the past year we have
seen companies trying to extend their payment terms by all manner of means–
some fair, some foul.
In addition to this many are revisiting
“rebates” from their suppliers. Suppliers will be asked for a 0.75% rebate if
their sales grow by 10%.
Earlier reports have suggested said the
rebate would rise to 5.25% if sales grew by more than 50%.
Amongst suppliers there is always a battle
to secure sales but there also has to been a commercial realism.
If by securing so-called “prestige”
business the overall operating margin carries a disproportionate return then it
becomes a question of commercial realism.
In such situations it may well be argued
that such business is best left to others.
No comments:
Post a Comment